Num 22:29-30

Excerpt:…This is a strong meat, first-AND-second-derivative equation of deep doctrinal Calculus. By it we differentiate to show a dual antitype. The 1844 nominal Adventists evangelized as Balaam’s inspiration at that time. Second and last derivative comes when the mustard seed evangelizes the world. The first is the church militant with a loyal laity serving as Balaam’s beast of burden. ‘Balaam said unto the ass, (I am striking you) Because thou hast mocked me: I would there were a sword in mine hand, for now would I kill thee.’ But, the Ass could talk proving that she prefigures human subordinates to Balaam. She responded, ‘Am not I thine ass, upon which thou hast … ridden unto this day? was I ever wont to kill thee?’ Here, in synopsis, we see that the second antitypical derivative, expresses antagonism between Balaam and the Shepherd’s Rod movement. She, Davidia, formerly cooperative from 1844 to 1930, ushers the time when she became obstinate: Serving thusly, she saw what Balaam, the nominal ministry, could not: She saw the sword of Ezekiel nine in the Holy Spirit’s hand and did so way before Christ opened Balaam’s eyes to it, today…