PsaIm  106: 34-42

Excerpt:…

…Hidden from all eyes, David’s son, the light always to be before the Lord, per 2Chron 21, teaches the world about God. So, as did Paul before us, we too, as end-time, Peteresque disciples, source David’s work to aid us in the mission to judge Israel. He said, “ Ps 106: 34 They did not destroy the nations, concerning whom the LORD commanded them: 35 But were mingled among the heathen, and learned their works 36 And they served their idols: which were a snare unto them. 37 Yea, they sacrificed their sons and their daughters unto devils, 38 And shed innocent blood even the blood of their sons and of their daughters, whom they sacrificed unto the idols of Canaan. Interruption: Here we see —centuries before White Anglo Saxon racism— cruelty to Israel was, by the snare of masonry, a matter of self-infliction. To the Lord’s chagrin, Israel selectively slaughtered the innocent fruit of Jacob’s loins to appease the devils of Canaan. When you think of the Lord’s hatred of a people, reflect also on that as we continue withreading:“Theyshed …38 …even the blood of their sons and of their daughters, whom they sacrificed unto the idols of Canaan: and the land was polluted with blood. 39 Thus were they defiled with their own works, and went a whoring with their own inventions. 40 Therefore was the wrath of the LORD kindled against his people, insomuch that he abhorred his own inheritance. 41 And he gave them into the hand of the heathen; and they that hated them ruled over them. 42 Their enemies also oppressed them (sound familiar), and they were brought into subjection under their hand.” —Psalms 106: 34-42.  In case you missed David’s description of the absolutely egregious abhorrence of Israel’s offenses, I will repeat the Text again to gather all light. But for now, it says Israel went a whoring with their own inventions. Again we see this is God’s deployment of artistic language. We see from Revelation, whoredom is a metaphor. It means the forward evangelism of self-engendered falsehood. Babylon, uses the same strategy to trapped Christian gentiles: Her zeal to use her government power to entice men into falsehood is the reason why she is described as a whore. Through Masonry, Christians even now extol her child-sacrificing voice of hell above the Bible. Their prospect of redemption is resultantly rendered bleaker. That aside, the central lesson is that Israel’s subjugation to the heathen came by her own spiritual infidelity: It comes when a man —though he be married to Christ bows himself low to— kiss Satan’s power and give to him his jollies … adult theme intended. But Israel’s sin was that her own inventions were the lure of her whorish seduction. Their elders, to convey divine credibility to their masses, used their lofty political and social perch, given to them by the Lord, to evangelically seduce commoners of her own people to honor devils over the Law. Human sacrifice was the devil’s lure to certify their loyalty to him by their use of self-concocted theology. Babylon’s fornication is one thing: She forced the nations to drink the illicit excretions of her fornication. Israel’s persuasion was boosted by way of the high office that God gave them. Sabbath keeping men today, must take heed to protect their children from the sword of Ezek nine: They must desist from compelling their falsehoods in their own circles of influence. Their refusal in this appeal is to commensurately sacrifice the innocent blood of their sons and daughters today…for, by Ezek nine, men, maids and children shall all fall. All Sabbath keepers therefore must choose to flee their leaders in favor of Bible evidence . We see from Revelation examples of evangelism by private inventios can be shown .Satan knows that the world hates Jerusalem, aka, Black America. By using that hatred as a tool, he seeks to destroy the Christian faith of gentiles; thus, his minions preach that Jesus is black. The Hebrew Israelites forward this sophistry with claims that Solomon was black. Solomon does claim to be black, and I do not deny this, his self-assessment. No need to for the Lord gave us His own complexion assessment of David, in 1Sam 16: 12. David was Solomon’s father, and of him, God said David was a good-looking, red man. In fact, He said more: He called him a man after His own heart. Beyond that, He promised to David the eternal throne of Adam. When seeking complexion affirmation —if such were to ever become our value— should not the Lord’s voice overwhelms that of backslidden Solomon’s. Afterall, Christ, canceled Solomon’s honor —not due to complexion, but— due to masonry, see 1Kings 11. The key lesson is, Christ manifested absolutely no complexion favor since before firing Solomon from His graces, He began Solomon’s throne by professing His love for Him. More than that, we can discern that Solomon’s claim to be black had no comparable connotation to the same adjective of our use today. This, since we inherited it from Europeans of whimsical and imprecise mind fog —just like their labels for red men and yellow men. Babylonian whoredom, just like Hebrew inventions, are not worthy of Gospel inclusion. To illustrate further, we cannot label David a member of the Cherokee nation because God called him a red man.Yet and still, Solomon’s claim to be black offers a very key component,by metaphor: .it validates and hpnprs the mustard seed’s election.. Remember, the Lord promised to use metaphors to define His wise man today. So by use of language art skills, let’s decipher the simile: How did Ancient David, a red man, produce Solomon, a black son? My personal ministerial history can resolve this conundrum: Nearly 46 years ago, when working for God, the church usher, standing at the closed door, guarded the inner sanctuary from disruption. Awaiting entry permission, I peered through the small vestibule door window to scan the audience within. Like David, to my delight, I spied a beautiful black woman in Zion. Then, seconds later, my heart throbbed as she, ignoring the usher, came through the other side of the door inches away. She went into the ladies room. When she emerged, I successfully shot my shot to secured her interest. The metaphor to Solomon now is applied, Solomon’s complexion must have come from Bathsheba: For likewise, in my marriage, we produced several children: One son is very fair and the other, like his mother, is dark. As did Solomon, the darker son joyously honored the Lord but only in his youth. The other, after 40 years, still walks in my light. Note the synergy: A red man, ancient David, also while in Zion, spied out Bathsheba a “black” woman, and together, they produce several sons, Solomon was the dark-skinned one. As with ancient David yesterday, I, his son today, enjoy female beauty regardless of skin tone, but, we both found special delight in our chocolate easter bunnies. If need be, take some time to absorb that metaphor. Next, note the key lesson to resolve today’s doctrinal conflicts: Bathsheba gave Solomon —not a new racial identity but simply— his complexion accentuating the scientific mystery of genetics. But by this experience, I then find comfort and harmony to Ps 89’s reflection: The Lord told David about the replica of David that He found: He said, I found the second David. This novel analysis is not of my invention; it is Bible based, but claims that Hebrews are black are a spurious invention. let’s read it again:“ Ps 106: 34 They did not destroy the nations, concerning whom the LORD commanded them …36 And they served their idols: which were a snare unto them. 37 Yea, they sacrificed their sons and their daughters unto devils … 39 Thus were they defiled with their own works, and went a whoring with their own inventions. 40 Therefore was the wrath of the LORD kindled against his people, insomuch that he abhorred his own inheritance. 41 And he gave them into the hand of the heathen … 42 Their enemies also oppressed them, and they were brought into subjection under their hand.” —Psalms 106: 34-42.  The slavery of Israel manifest that God placed them in their enemies hands.